Posted by: ico on February 16, 2009 at 23:31:28
If this actually has THE predator then it will be stupid, hopefully they cant do it for legal problems.
Posted by: kidshamrock78 on February 17, 2009 at 00:54:09
wow
just wow such a bad idea
Posted by: Jason on February 17, 2009 at 01:31:40
why are they doing this? these ideas sound really stupid
Posted by: mez on February 17, 2009 at 09:05:46
couldnt be the real "predator" due to legal rights, unless they paid for the character use, which would probably cost them more than their whole budget...as im thinking this is a strait to DVD P.O.S.
why is this the new trend? anyone actually interested in seeing these jane austin with monster movies?
Posted by: General Gokemidoro on February 17, 2009 at 10:25:02
It says "a blood thirsty" alien which THE predator was not. Even if it is THE predator it can't be any worse than Alien vs. Predator 2.
Posted by: ico on February 17, 2009 at 16:23:35
General Gokemidoro
THE predator was blood thirsty, it was trying to kill people, thats what blood thirsty means.
Apparently the rights arent too hard to get because i remember seeing a short film which has Batman vs. Alien vs. Predator and it was actually pretty decent, you can probably find it on Youtube or something.
Posted by: Ryan Rotten, Managing Editor on February 17, 2009 at 16:41:33
No, this won't be the actual "Predator" owned by Fox. And that fan-made movie you mentioned, Ico, isn't approved by the studio.
This is all very misleading and I think purposely so.
Posted by: Bib V on February 17, 2009 at 21:26:16
I'd love to watch prissy English *****es getting ripped apart! All set, I hope the alien shoves Darcy's letter down his pink throat!!!!
Posted by: celine on February 18, 2009 at 05:26:00
im just hoping this whole thing is some early april fools day joke.... really hoping....
« Previous Page | | | Page 1 of 1 | | | Total: 9 comments | | | Next Page » |